Comments for That Movie Sucked http://www.thatmoviesucked.com Movie Reviews. Movie News. Sarcasm. Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:21:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Review: ‘Dragon Tattoo’ as Dark and Edgy as the Tattoo Itself by ThatMovieSucked.com http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/07/review-dragon-tattoo-as-dark-and-edgy-as-the-tattoo-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-152 ThatMovieSucked.com Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:21:00 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1919#comment-152 Yeah, I saw the dubbed version as well. I'd also rather read than hear shitty voice-overs, though in this case, I didn't think it was too bad because I'm pretty sure the actors themselves provided the English. Yeah, I saw the dubbed version as well. I’d also rather read than hear shitty voice-overs, though in this case, I didn’t think it was too bad because I’m pretty sure the actors themselves provided the English.

]]> Comment on Review: ‘Dragon Tattoo’ as Dark and Edgy as the Tattoo Itself by Karen http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/07/review-dragon-tattoo-as-dark-and-edgy-as-the-tattoo-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-146 Karen Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:02:00 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1919#comment-146 I really liked this movie, despite my husband complaining about the slow pace for the first half. The only thing that really bugged me, was that I saw a dubbed version. I'd rather see subtitles any day. I really liked this movie, despite my husband complaining about the slow pace for the first half. The only thing that really bugged me, was that I saw a dubbed version. I’d rather see subtitles any day.

]]> Comment on Review: ‘Scott Pilgrim’ Pwns Noobs by Review: ‘The Expendables’ is All Flex, No Muscle http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/08/review-scott-pilgrim-pwns-noobs/comment-page-1/#comment-145 Review: ‘The Expendables’ is All Flex, No Muscle Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:09:17 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=2042#comment-145 [...] cruel irony is that The Expendables is currently kicking the crap out of Scott Pilgrim vs. the World at the box office. I say ‘irony’ because Scott Pilgrim offers up action scenes far cooler and [...] [...] cruel irony is that The Expendables is currently kicking the crap out of Scott Pilgrim vs. the World at the box office. I say ‘irony’ because Scott Pilgrim offers up action scenes far cooler and [...]

]]> Comment on The Lovechild of X-Men and Futurama by Al http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/06/the-lovechild-of-x-men-and-futurama/comment-page-1/#comment-73 Al Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:59:48 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1720#comment-73 why wasn't leela cyclops why wasn't leela cyclops

]]> Comment on Review: Calling Your Movie “The Losers” Just Makes it Easier to Mock by ThatMovieSucked.com http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/04/review-calling-your-movie-the-losers-just-makes-it-easier-to-mock/comment-page-1/#comment-70 ThatMovieSucked.com Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:40:04 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1372#comment-70 It is true that mass child death does bring the chuckles. No argument there. I am, however, a bit confused about your criticism.<br><br>At one point you say “the actin suked”, but then later you follow up with, “The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes”. But even ignoring this contradiction, by your own words, you pretty much agree with my entire review. You say, “Every thing you said was completely right expcept "the losers wasnt terrible"”. Well, to be fair, I never actually said The Losers isn’t terrible. It is terrible. That’s why I gave it a 2 - the same rating as Twilight: Eclipse, which I think any non-Twihard who had the misfortune of watching that excrement would know is pretty fucking bad.<br><br>What I said was, “The Losers isn’t a terrible action movie…”. It’s not. It did have 3-4 well-directed action scenes. Lots of shit blows up and it has decent enough fight choreography. But I even had reservations about these aspects of the movie, and that’s why I found myself choking on saying, “The Losers is a good action movie”. It definitely isn’t, for reasons outlined in the review. So “not being terrible action” is the best I can offer up with a clear conscience. Hope that clarifies things. It is true that mass child death does bring the chuckles. No argument there. I am, however, a bit confused about your criticism.

At one point you say “the actin suked”, but then later you follow up with, “The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes”. But even ignoring this contradiction, by your own words, you pretty much agree with my entire review. You say, “Every thing you said was completely right expcept “the losers wasnt terrible””. Well, to be fair, I never actually said The Losers isn’t terrible. It is terrible. That’s why I gave it a 2 – the same rating as Twilight: Eclipse, which I think any non-Twihard who had the misfortune of watching that excrement would know is pretty fucking bad.

What I said was, “The Losers isn’t a terrible action movie…”. It’s not. It did have 3-4 well-directed action scenes. Lots of shit blows up and it has decent enough fight choreography. But I even had reservations about these aspects of the movie, and that’s why I found myself choking on saying, “The Losers is a good action movie”. It definitely isn’t, for reasons outlined in the review. So “not being terrible action” is the best I can offer up with a clear conscience. Hope that clarifies things.

]]> Comment on Review: Calling Your Movie “The Losers” Just Makes it Easier to Mock by ThatMovieSucked.com http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/04/review-calling-your-movie-the-losers-just-makes-it-easier-to-mock/comment-page-1/#comment-68 ThatMovieSucked.com Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:37:05 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1372#comment-68 It is true that mass child death does bring the chuckles. No argument there. I am, however, a bit confused about your criticism.<br><br>At one point you say “the actin suked”, but then later you follow up with, “The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes”. But even ignoring this contradiction, by your own words, you pretty much agree with my entire review. You say, “Every thing you said was completely right expcept "the losers wasnt terrible"”. Well, to be fair, I never actually said The Losers isn’t terrible. It is terrible. That’s why I gave it a 2 - the same rating as Twilight: Eclipse, which I think any non-Twihard who had the misfortune of watching that excrement would know is pretty fucking bad.<br><br>What I said was, “The Losers isn’t a terrible action movie…”. It’s not. It did have 3-4 well-directed action scenes. Lots of shit blows up and it has decent enough fight choreography. But I even had reservations about these aspects of the movie, and that’s why I found myself choking on saying, “The Losers is a good action movie”. It definitely isn’t, for reasons outlined in the review. So “not being terrible action” is the best I can offer up with a clear conscience. Hope that clarifies things. It is true that mass child death does bring the chuckles. No argument there. I am, however, a bit confused about your criticism.

At one point you say “the actin suked”, but then later you follow up with, “The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes”. But even ignoring this contradiction, by your own words, you pretty much agree with my entire review. You say, “Every thing you said was completely right expcept “the losers wasnt terrible””. Well, to be fair, I never actually said The Losers isn’t terrible. It is terrible. That’s why I gave it a 2 – the same rating as Twilight: Eclipse, which I think any non-Twihard who had the misfortune of watching that excrement would know is pretty fucking bad.

What I said was, “The Losers isn’t a terrible action movie…”. It’s not. It did have 3-4 well-directed action scenes. Lots of shit blows up and it has decent enough fight choreography. But I even had reservations about these aspects of the movie, and that’s why I found myself choking on saying, “The Losers is a good action movie”. It definitely isn’t, for reasons outlined in the review. So “not being terrible action” is the best I can offer up with a clear conscience. Hope that clarifies things.

]]> Comment on Review: Calling Your Movie “The Losers” Just Makes it Easier to Mock by Oreo http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/04/review-calling-your-movie-the-losers-just-makes-it-easier-to-mock/comment-page-1/#comment-69 Oreo Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:11:43 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1372#comment-69 oh and i was soupped in the beginin when the comedian from watchmen was in the movie. i lost alot of respect for him for bein in the movie. i dont think its the actors fault its the movie and the lines they had two read. EXCEPT you no who. who cant act to save her life. SHe SUX sO BAd. its not funny i cant belive i sat and watch this whole movie. i mean wtf. its so fuckin bad. im dyin lil by little knowin this movie made 23 million so far and they only spent 25 million. I hate this movie and all the useless suspenseful music in the backround for such mundane conversations JESUS CHRIST this movie blew im gonna stop right there oh and i was soupped in the beginin when the comedian from watchmen was in the movie. i lost alot of respect for him for bein in the movie. i dont think its the actors fault its the movie and the lines they had two read. EXCEPT you no who. who cant act to save her life. SHe SUX sO BAd. its not funny i cant belive i sat and watch this whole movie. i mean wtf. its so fuckin bad. im dyin lil by little knowin this movie made 23 million so far and they only spent 25 million. I hate this movie and all the useless suspenseful music in the backround for such mundane conversations JESUS CHRIST this movie blew im gonna stop right there

]]> Comment on Review: Calling Your Movie “The Losers” Just Makes it Easier to Mock by OReO http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/04/review-calling-your-movie-the-losers-just-makes-it-easier-to-mock/comment-page-1/#comment-67 OReO Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:45 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1372#comment-67 Jesus Christ guy every one on the internet is being way too nice to this movie. The Losers f@#$ing blew sweaty ballz. It was unbelievable. Watch it again you ll die laughing. The fu%%ing movie started with a rocket blowing up a helicopter full of children. Thats fu$#ed up, Hilarious, Cool, and Hilarious again. But afta that the movie had nothing. The actin suked especially that black Bitch. She was terrible i only saw that movie cause i seen the movie in the daily show or colbert i forget. Every thing you said was completely right expcept "the losers wasnt terrible". the i could see the each character fit in nicely in any movie but not together (except the black girl shes sux watch the movie again you ll laugh every time she opens her mouth). The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes and couple funny quotes. DISASTER MOVIE was a better movie. i just dont no wat they were thinkin. Sorry for reapeatin this but WATCH the movie again a change your review lol. i wouldnt bother but anything that isnt hateful towards this movie just pisses me off. Jesus Christ guy every one on the internet is being way too nice to this movie. The Losers f@#$ing blew sweaty ballz. It was unbelievable. Watch it again you ll die laughing. The fu%%ing movie started with a rocket blowing up a helicopter full of children. Thats fu$#ed up, Hilarious, Cool, and Hilarious again. But afta that the movie had nothing. The actin suked especially that black Bitch. She was terrible i only saw that movie cause i seen the movie in the daily show or colbert i forget. Every thing you said was completely right expcept “the losers wasnt terrible”. the i could see the each character fit in nicely in any movie but not together (except the black girl shes sux watch the movie again you ll laugh every time she opens her mouth). The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes and couple funny quotes. DISASTER MOVIE was a better movie. i just dont no wat they were thinkin. Sorry for reapeatin this but WATCH the movie again a change your review lol. i wouldnt bother but anything that isnt hateful towards this movie just pisses me off.

]]> Comment on Review: Calling Your Movie “The Losers” Just Makes it Easier to Mock by ThatMovieSucked.com http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/04/review-calling-your-movie-the-losers-just-makes-it-easier-to-mock/comment-page-1/#comment-730 ThatMovieSucked.com Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:38:00 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1372#comment-730 It is true that mass child death does bring the chuckles. No argument there. I am, however, a bit confused about your criticism. At one point you say “the actin suked”, but then later you follow up with, “The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes”. But even ignoring this contradiction, by your own words, you pretty much agree with my entire review. You say, “Every thing you said was completely right expcept "the losers wasnt terrible"”. Well, to be fair, I never actually said The Losers isn’t terrible. It is terrible. That’s why I gave it a 2 - the same rating as Twilight: Eclipse, which I think any non-Twihard who had the misfortune of watching that excrement would know is pretty fucking bad. What I said was, “The Losers isn’t a terrible action movie…”. It’s not. It did have 3-4 well-directed action scenes. Lots of shit blows up and it has decent enough fight choreography. But I even had reservations about these aspects of the movie, and that’s why I found myself choking on saying, “The Losers is a good action movie”. It definitely isn’t, for reasons outlined in the review. So “not being terrible action” is the best I can offer up with a clear conscience. Hope that clarifies things. It is true that mass child death does bring the chuckles. No argument there. I am, however, a bit confused about your criticism.

At one point you say “the actin suked”, but then later you follow up with, “The only thing this movie had was 3 or 4 well directed action scenes”. But even ignoring this contradiction, by your own words, you pretty much agree with my entire review. You say, “Every thing you said was completely right expcept “the losers wasnt terrible””. Well, to be fair, I never actually said The Losers isn’t terrible. It is terrible. That’s why I gave it a 2 – the same rating as Twilight: Eclipse, which I think any non-Twihard who had the misfortune of watching that excrement would know is pretty fucking bad.

What I said was, “The Losers isn’t a terrible action movie…”. It’s not. It did have 3-4 well-directed action scenes. Lots of shit blows up and it has decent enough fight choreography. But I even had reservations about these aspects of the movie, and that’s why I found myself choking on saying, “The Losers is a good action movie”. It definitely isn’t, for reasons outlined in the review. So “not being terrible action” is the best I can offer up with a clear conscience. Hope that clarifies things.

]]> Comment on Review: Twilight: Eclipse – the Best of the Worst is Still Pretty Bad by Guest http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/2010/07/review-twilight-eclipse-the-best-of-the-worst-is-still-pretty-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-66 Guest Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:42:44 +0000 http://www.thatmoviesucked.com/?p=1887#comment-66 Yes, someone should tell Stewart that you don't need a prescription for laxatives. You can get them right over the counter. Probably only a couple of aisles away from the Midol which she doesn't take either, but probably should. Yes, someone should tell Stewart that you don't need a prescription for laxatives. You can get them right over the counter. Probably only a couple of aisles away from the Midol which she doesn't take either, but probably should.

]]>